Mixing Webflow and traditional coding

I’ve been building websites for a while now, and I’ve tried just about every tool that promises to make the process faster, easier, or “code-free.” Webflow is one of the few that actually delivers. It’s flexible, it’s fast, and it lets me design and build in the same space — which still feels kind of magical sometimes.

Most of the time, I can go from concept to live site without writing a single line of code. Webflow gives me the freedom to focus on structure, content, and flow instead of worrying about setup and deployment. I can drag, drop, and tweak my way to something that looks beautiful and performs well.

But still, there are moments when I find myself reaching for code.

Not because I don’t trust Webflow — I do. It’s more that there are certain things code does better. Little things that make a big difference once you start to care about the details.

Sometimes it’s a tiny interaction that Webflow can’t handle natively — like a smooth fade when a user scrolls into view, or a more precise control over timing that makes a motion feel “right.” Other times it’s structure: maybe I want cleaner markup, more semantic control, or a layout that doesn’t quite fit into Webflow’s visual system.

That’s where traditional coding — HTML, CSS, and JavaScript — comes in.

For me, using both Webflow and code isn’t about showing off or trying to be “better than no-code.” It’s about balance. Webflow gives me a strong visual foundation and keeps me productive. Traditional coding lets me refine, customize, and go deeper when I need to.

It’s like using power tools and hand tools in the same project. The power tools get you 90% there fast — the hand tools make that last 10% perfect.

And honestly, I enjoy that last 10%. Writing code by hand gives me a kind of control that feels personal. When I’m adjusting a CSS property or scripting a custom animation, I feel connected to what I’m building. It slows me down in a good way.

That said, I’m not in love with the “code everything from scratch” mindset anymore. I used to be. I used to think real developers hand-coded every line. Now I just care that the website works beautifully, loads fast, and is easy for the client to maintain later on.

If Webflow can do it cleanly, I let it. If not, I code it. It’s that simple.

Mixing the two worlds — visual development and traditional code — has completely changed how I build. My process is smoother, my projects move faster, and my results feel sharper.

Clients don’t really care how it’s built. They care that it works, that it looks good, and that they can manage it easily. Webflow lets me deliver that, and code lets me take it one step further when needed.

So yeah, Webflow can do almost everything. But for me, that “almost” is important. It’s the space where I get to experiment, learn, and push things just a bit further than the default.

And that’s the fun part — because building websites isn’t just about getting it done fast. It’s about enjoying the craft.

‍